Pebellslearn by building
0%
RoadmapsMatrixCoursesSandboxSign in
Content Research  ›  Capstone Project

Topic Score — Choosing What to Write Next

Topic Score 14 minA topic score rates every content idea on the same factors, such as demand, fit and gap, with evidence for each number, so the team can rank ideas consistently and write the most useful ones first.

Topic Score — Choosing What to Write Next

Your research list now holds 23 topic ideas, gathered from tickets, forums, keyword data and engineers' requests. You can write perhaps four this month. Left to gut feeling, you would pick the most interesting ones. A topic score helps you pick the most useful ones, and explain why to anyone who asks.

The rule

Score every idea on the same factors, then write from the top.

A topic score is a small rubric applied to every idea in the same way. Teams build their own; here is a simple one with three factors, each scored from 1 to 3:

  • Demand: evidence that people need it, such as ticket counts, how often it recurs in communities, and search volume.
  • Fit: how closely it relates to the product and to the personas you serve.
  • Gap: 3 if no good answer exists anywhere; 1 if a good answer already exists, perhaps even your own.

Add the three for a total out of 9. Write the highest first. When two ideas tie, the one that takes less effort goes first.

Topic idea Demand Fit Gap Total
Alerts are not arriving 3: 46 tickets 3: core feature 3: no page anywhere 9
Site shows as down but loads fine 3: 31 tickets, rising searches 3: core feature 2: scattered, outdated forum answers 8
Status pages for small businesses 2: steady searches 3: product feature 1: many good guides exist 6
History of uptime monitoring 1: almost no signal 1: loosely related 2: few good accounts 4

Teams often adapt the rubric: doubling demand, adding a "business priority" factor, or scoring from 1 to 5. That is fine. What matters is that every idea is scored the same way, with the evidence written down.

The shortcut

Evidence beside every number. Never write a score without the fact that justifies it. Then add, sort and start at the top.

Scoring "Set up Slack alerts"Step 1 of 5
  1. Demand

    Nine tickets last month and modest search volume: 2.

The trap is treating the score as an oracle. It makes decisions consistent and open to discussion; it does not replace judgement. When a launch or an urgent request overrides the ranking, say so openly instead of bending the numbers.

Drills

Answer fast — trust the rule.

quick drill

An idea scores Demand 2, Fit 3 and Gap 1. What is its total?

quick drill

Two ideas both total 8. How does this rubric decide which comes first?

quick drill

What does a Gap score of 1 mean?

quick drill

Why write the evidence beside each score?

quick drill

"History of uptime monitoring" scores 4, but the CEO wants it for a conference talk next week. What is the best way to handle it?

Remember

  • Score every idea on the same factors, then write from the top.
  • Shortcut: evidence beside every number, then add, sort and break ties by effort.
  • Trap: treating the score as an oracle, or bending numbers to match a decision.

Practice — level up

0/1 solved

Write your answer, then compare it with a rubric and a model answer.

ExplainScore and rank three ideas

Score these three Nightjar ideas for Demand, Fit and Gap (1 to 3 each), give the evidence for each score, and say which you would write first: (A) "Stop alerts during planned maintenance": 18 tickets a month, rising searches, no page exists. (B) "What is uptime?": high search volume, but dozens of excellent explanations already exist. (C) "Use Nightjar with a website builder": 3 tickets a month, a few forum questions, no page exists.